Avoid project failure - transfer of ownership of assets

In every organization there are jobs that need to be made. These jobs are typically defined by the table of organization. Distribution is prospecting, customer service, dealing with irate customers and so on. However, there are inevitable situations in which jobs are vacant. These activities must be held by someone somewhere, but they are a hot potato business. And in no time flat, these jobs are the source of the frustration and the struggle between the departments, like anyDesperately battles to ensure that they do not get the blame for the ball.

I see this especially during the implementation of new IT systems. Nobody wants to involve the tightening or the additional work in the hands of a new project. Usually this is because the Council takes a decision, something new, without allocation to implement the supervisory responsibilities. So, here I am for someone who can answer questions or to make decisions that could affect the whole, lookingCorporation. How do I know if you like FIFO or LIFO?

Online Project Management Training

Therefore it is important for companies is to assign more than anyone is responsible for a project. Among other things, should make it to the competent authority to take decisions for the company! There is nothing that guarantees frustration and failure faster than forcing someone who has a responsibility without giving them the power to see through the shoulder. Responsibility without power slows down everythingfrom, because every time a decision must be made, the perpetrator is someone the choice to find.

This is why many projects fail. Just like the famous quote says: "Victory has a hundred fathers but defeat is an orphan." It seems that many projects fail from the beginning doomed to failure, because everyone can make a difference, too busy running from possible bankruptcy. If in these circumstances, it seems ridiculous to explain, but I've seen in more situationsas I remember. I am the vice-president, seen as the feudal lords in their services for cover when a new rule announced project is executed. They hedge, and search every corner to push the project to work on someone else. They say they are too busy, too little or insufficient funding. Strangely, these are usually the leaders themselves that my life is complicated with ridiculous requests and demands. These leaders are not in possession of the project and are part of theProblem.

But what I mean when I say, someone taking ownership of the project? Always remember that the power will not be disclosed or transferred. The power supply must be ensured. If ever the person given the responsibility and authority takes ownership of the project, will never be more than a janitor. They will be afraid to make decisions and initiate responses to their caregivers in an eternal game CYA. Unless someone takes ownership of the project, the chances of successdrastically reduced.

Avoid project failure - transfer of ownership of assets